waiting to send decision to author npj

31010402000380, , editor@medsci.cn. Author IJ holds shares in [company name A] but and declares no non-financial competing interests. Springer Nature is committed to diversity, equity and inclusion; Nature Portfolio journals strive for diverse demographic representation of Peer-Reviewers. Author CD serves as [Editor role title] of this journal and had no role in the peer-review or decision to publish this manuscript. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories). Sources for kits should be identified. If the manuscript was peer reviewed the referee comments are also transferrable on request by the author. 0, 80 DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. After submitting your decision, the 'Notify Author' page appears if your role has permission to draft the decision letter. Please note that modification of Supplementary Information after the paper is published requires a formal correction, so authors are encouraged to check their Supplementary Information carefully before submitting the final version. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information, such as conflicts of interest, and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. Manuscripts should be submitted via the online submission system: Submit manuscript. It may be that the journal might be waiting to decide based on the theme of the upcoming issue. Figures divided into parts should be labeled with a lower-case bold a, b, and so on, in the same type size as used elsewhere in the figure. 25.0%, Figures should not contain more than one panel unless the parts are logically connected; each panel of a multipart figure should be sized so that the whole figure can be reduced by the same amount and reproduced at the smallest size at which essential details are visible. J. Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the Editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. Codes and software should be available and properly referenced in the article and/or supplementary information. Reviewer selection is critical to the publication process, and we base our choice on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations and our own previous experience of a Reviewer's characteristics. criteria that authors should consider before submitting papers to npj Digital Medicine. The decision letter will specify a deadline, and revisions that are returned within this period will retain their original submission date. Commercial suppliers of reagents or instrumentation should be identified. "The male with the appointment at the university? Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. Stamped Concrete Cyprus Uncategorized waiting to send decision to author npj. The peer review process of any submission associated with a collection or special issue is handled by an Editor who is responsible for assigning at least two referees to each article and evaluating the reviews. Manaster, J. Sloth squeak. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. (Abstracts or unrefereed web preprints do not compromise novelty). What does a status change from "Required reviews completed" back to "Under review" mean? Soc., 2016, 138, 8356-8359, , Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. Thousands should be separated by commas (1,000). In cases where the referees have requested well-defined changes to the manuscript that do not appear to require extensive further experiments, Editors may request a revised manuscript that addresses the referees' concerns. When appropriate, figures should include error bars. Please do not submit revisions as new manuscripts. When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. Labeling must be of sufficient size and contrast to be readable, even after appropriate reduction. Alternatively, they can be supplied as a separate supplementary data file (ideally as a plain, unformatted text file). NPJ PARKINSONS DIS . Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. In cases where the referees' concerns are more wide-ranging, Editors will normally reject the manuscript. The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Article titles should be in Roman text, the first word of the title should be capitalized and the title written exactly as it appears in the work cited, ending with a full stop.

Orange Avenue Accident, Worst Neighborhoods In Springfield, Il, Articles W

waiting to send decision to author npjLeave a Reply